đACJR Members Are Now Getting Free Stuff đ
The best blockchain and crypto industry coverage in April 2021
Hello again, from the Association of Cryptocurrency Journalists and Researchers! đ
Since ACJR is now open to membership applications, new members are finally getting to enjoy their perks. (If you want to join, you can fill out a quick application form here.)Â
These goodies include a free subscription to The Streetâs Crypto Investor newsletter (launched with help from ACJR co-founder Pete Rizzo) and free enrollment for the Certificate in Blockchain and Digital AssetsÂŽ from the RIA Digital Assets Council and New York Institute of Finance. Itâs a self-paced course with 10 modules, guided by technology experts like Scott Stornetta. To enroll for free, contact Don Friedman at don@riadac.com or (646) 321-1785.
This month we also debuted exclusive âOff the Recordâ events for journalists, underwritten by institutional ACJR member YAP Global. These sessions are perfect for reporters that cover topics related to cryptocurrency. (Sign up for the next two in April!)
Plus, yet another fun thing members get to do is cast votes for the first (but definitely not the last) ACJR awards! This spring, reporters and researchers in the blockchain space will have the chance to win awards in three categories: Reporter of the Year, Researcher of the Year, and Story of the Year. You can vote for your favorite articles and reports here â but you need to be an ACJR member first. Apply right here to enjoy the full variety of membership benefits, including a members-only chat group.Â
Weâll get back to applicants on a rolling basis, as soon as the raging bull market allows us. Thereâs so much demand for blockchain expertise these days that Time Magazine is looking for an executive who understands bitcoin, because the company itself appears to hold bitcoin and accepts bitcoin payments for branded content.Â
đđđđđ
In addition to the awesome articles weâll discuss below, we also wanted to highlight the CoinShares research report about regulations across Europe and the Forbes report on Coinbase earnings in Q1 2021. We loved that report as well as the Messari report called âThe Social Token Bible.â Here are some of the other outstanding articles that we enjoyed since last month:
âChina Creates Its Own Digital Currency, a First for Major Economyâ by James Areddy, Wall Street Journal
This piece dives into one of the most important geopolitical topics of our generation. The Chinese governmentâs approach to digital currency management will change the world, regardless of how it plays out. Kudos to the reporter for explaining these details simply and effectively.
âSingapore PM Says Name, Photo Were Used to Sell Cryptocurrencyâ by Jim Silver, Bloomberg
The token startup BitClout is using public figuresâ images and information, without consent, to promote a proprietary currency. This article notes the political challenges created by this crypto companyâs business model, especially with regards to social media verification and misinformation. It is short and clear. We love that.
âThe Mysterious Influencer Stock Market Worth $1 Billionâ by Jen Wieczner, New York Magazine
This old school feature takes a much deeper look at BitClout, including information about the investors and the founder behind the platform. All the nitty gritty details. We love how comprehensive and nuanced it is.
âMicroStrategy Is Winning With Bitcoin. Software Is a Side Business Nowâ by Eric Savitz, BarronâsÂ
Microstrategy CEO Michael Saylor is the latest celebrity bitcoin bull to capture the publicâs attention. This piece shows how the executiveâs bitcoin advocacy impacts his companyâs business model. Â
âWhat Critics Donât Understand About NFTsâ by Jonthan Zittrain and Will Marks, The Atlantic
Even though our last newsletter was very NFT-heavy, the melodious comparisons between the demand for NFTs with real-world examples is too poetic not to highlight. If we ignore the singular trite tulip reference, we get powerful opinions like âthe internet itself similarly functions as a collective hallucination, owned by no one.â
âżđâż
Plus, for funsies, here is an example of a story we wish did just one thing differently:
âThe Bitcoin Terrorists of Idlib are Learning New Tricksâ by Rachel Rose-OâLeary, WiredÂ
We hate this headline. (Is there such a thing as a âdollar terroristâ or an âiPhone terroristâ?â What is that combination of nouns?!) âIdlib Terrorists Are Learning New Bitcoin Tricksâ would have been more accurate. Technically, this piece was published in late March. We made an exception, and included it in this April newsletter, because we agree with the CoinDesk column saying there is social value in crime reporting. Bitcoin is just a tool. Reporters may describe how criminals and terrorists use tools, whether that tool is Telegram or Bitcoin. Yet we wish this piece put more emphasis on broader bitcoin volumes in the Levant region. Without that context, it seems as if bitcoin users in Idilb (Syria) have a propensity for criminal activity. To the contrary, saying terrorists raised more than $117,717 in bitcoin is to say they are infrequent and inefficient users. Many civilian users in the Levant may trade larger volumes than that every month. It is the editorâs responsibility to make sure an article provides such nuanced context.  Â
âżđâż
Remember, ACJR has a lot more going on than just this (fabulous) newsletter. You can suggest topics for our future online meetups and participate in our book club via Telegram. If you want to help us with upcoming programs, please contact us via social media or our website.
âď¸âď¸âď¸
Next, weâll turn to a guest column from Cointelegraph editor Jon Rice, about the importance of journalistic corrections and updates:
One of the toughest words for a journalist to master is âsorry.â
If you make an honest mistake in an article, a retraction or correction is the appropriate way to handle the situation â no need for extensive mea culpas and public hand-wringing. Correcting the content is the accepted mechanism for righting a journalistic wrong.
Sometimes, in addition to an update in the content itself, a simple apology is also necessary. This is especially true in situations where the mistake was not factual or grammatical, but an error of judgement. Part of our job as journalists is to ensure that we represent our readers, subjects, and constituents with respect and empathy. We should make every effort to avoid using language or terminology that minimizes or harms our audience. We must also acknowledge that language evolves and meanings change.
For example, in 2010 President Obama signed Rosaâs Law, a bill that replaced the term âmental retardationâ with âintellectual disabilityâ in educational and government documents. The National Center on Disability and Journalism subsequently addressed the use of such language in order to avoid âmonolithicâ descriptions of people with disabilities. This journalistic organization determined reporters should âuse language that refers to the person first and the disability second. For example: âthe writer, who has a disabilityâ instead of âthe disabled writer.ââ
As reporters within an industry that has well-documented issues with diversity and inclusion, it is particularly incumbent upon us to use language carefully, to provide a welcome to all potential participants in our space, and to avoid terms that are divisive or demeaning. After all, Bitcoin is for everyone.Â
âżđâż
Thatâs it for April! Please keep sending us all the memes, and of course, follow us on Twitter, join our Telegram group and check out our website. We canât wait to see what the market has in store for us in May!
Donât think, just click! đ
Thanks to Milos Subotic for this awesome meme!
Great content. Loved Jon Rice's write-up